Pallidal stimulation in advanced Parkinson's patients with contraindications for subthalamic stimulation
✍ Scribed by Tiphaine Rouaud; Thibaut Dondaine; Sophie Drapier; Claire Haegelen; François Lallement; Julie Péron; Sylvie Raoul; Paul Sauleau; Marc Vérin
- Book ID
- 102503465
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 80 KB
- Volume
- 25
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-3185
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bilateral pallidal (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) 6 months after surgery in advanced parkinsonian patients whose dopa‐resistant axial motor signs or cognitive decline constituted contraindications for subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS. Seventeen patients with a mean age of 59.3 ± 7.1 years (range, 45–70), mean disease duration of 12.5 ± 4.3 years (range, 7–20), and contraindications for STN DBS, underwent bilateral GPi DBS. They were evaluated before surgery and 6 months afterward, in accordance with Core Assessment Program for Intracerebral Transplantation recommendations. There were mean improvements of 41.1% in the UPDRS III motor score in the off‐dopa condition and 20.3% in the activities of daily living score. Motor fluctuations were reduced by 22.9% and dyskinesias by 68.6%. Axial motor signs improved in the off‐dopa condition by 34.2%. Neuropsychological performances remained unchanged at the 6‐month assessment. Bilateral GPi DBS is both safe and effective in advanced parkinsonian patients with untreatable motor fluctuations, for whom STN DBS is contraindicated due to dopa‐resistant axial motor signs or cognitive decline. As such, it should be regarded as a viable option for these patients. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Bilateral high‐frequency stimulation of the internal globus pallidus (GPi) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN) both alleviate akinesia, rigidity, and tremor in idiopathic Parkinson's disease. To test the specific effect of these procedures on gait, we used quantitative gait analysis in ad