✦ LIBER ✦

Pairing simple and complex models could improve predictions

✍ Scribed by Balcerak, Ernie

Book ID: 119682517
Publisher: American Geophysical Union
Year: 2012
Tongue: English
Weight: 971 KB
Volume: 93
Category: Article
ISSN: 0096-3941
DOI: 10.1029/2012eo080014

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Use of paired simple and complex models

Use of paired simple and complex models to reduce predictive bias and quantify uncertainty

✍ Doherty, John; Christensen, Steen 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 American Geophysical Union 🌐 English ⚖ 889 KB

Influencing models to improve their pred

Influencing models to improve their predictions of standard samples

✍ Rocco DiFoggio 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 155 KB 👁 1 views

Integrating empirical studies and global

Integrating empirical studies and global models to improve climate change predictions

✍ Batterman, Sarah A.; Larsen, Klaus Steenberg 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 American Geophysical Union 🌐 English ⚖ 502 KB

Could birthweight prediction models be i

Could birthweight prediction models be improved by adding fetal subcutaneous tissue thickness?

✍ Giovanni Larciprete; Giuseppe Di Pierro; Giulia Barbati; Therese Deaibess; Sheba 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 146 KB

Complex networks and simple models in bi

Complex networks and simple models in biology

✍ de Silva, Eric; Stumpf, Michael P.H. 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 The Royal Society 🌐 English ⚖ 289 KB

Forecasting quarterly hog prices: Simple

Forecasting quarterly hog prices: Simple autoregressive models vs. naive predictions

✍ Ole Gjølberg; Berth-Arne Bengtsson 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 85 KB

In this note, we study the forecasting performance of some simple models applied to the hog markets in the Nordic countries. In terms of accuracy (MSE and MAPE), a simple autoregressive model outperforms the naive expectations benchmark in some samples, as does a very simple VAR-type model in which