𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended schedule etoposide in the treatment of small cell lung carcinoma

✍ Scribed by John D. Hainsworth; Steven L. Stroup; F. Anthony Greco


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Weight
577 KB
Volume
77
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


BACKGROUND.

Paclitaxel is an active agent in the initial treatment of patients with small cell lung carcinoma. The authors evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of paclitaxel (1-hour infusion) added to a standard combination regimen of carboplatin and etoposide in a Phase I1 trial for the treatment of patients with small cell lung carcinoma.

METHODS.

Thirty-eight patients with previously untreated small cell lung carcinoma were treated with a combination regimen including paclitaxel, 135 mg/m2 by 1-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion, on Day 1; carboplatin at AUC 5, on Day 1; and oral etoposide, 100 mg alternated with 50 mg, on Days 1-10. Prior to availability of reimbursement for oral etoposide, 13 patients received etoposide, 25 mg/mZ i.v. on Days 1-5 and 8-12. Treatment courses were repeated every 21 days for a total of 4 courses. Patients with limited stage disease received radiation therapy (4500 centrigray in 25 fractions) concurrently with the last 2 courses of chemotherapy. RESULTS. This combination chemotherapy regimen was easily tolerated. Eleven episodes of Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia occurred in 9 patients (8% of courses); Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia and anemia were also infrequent. Fifteen patients were hospitalized for treatment of fever associated with leukopenia. Concurrent treatment with chemotherapy and radiation therapy was also tolerable, but was more toxic; 6 of 15 patients (40%) developed esophagitis (Grade 3 in 5 patients, Grade 4 in 1 patient), and 45% of all episodes of Grade 3/4 leukopenia occurred during concurrent therapy. Other nonhematologic toxicity was uncommon. Twenty-nine of 38 patients (76%) achieved a partial or complete response to treatment (limited stage, 14 of 15 patients, 93%; extensive stage, 15 of 23 patients, 65%). The complete response rate was 26% (limited stage disease, 40% versus extensive stage disease, 17%). Median actuarial overall survival was 7 months for patients with extensive stage disease, and 17 months for patients with limited stage disease. Prophylactic whole brain irradiation was not used, and seven patients developed brain metastases as their initial site of relapse. CONCLUSIONS. The combination of paclitaxel, administered by 1-hour infusion, carboplatin, and extended schedule etoposide is feasible and well tolerated in the doses administered in this Phase I1 trial. This regimen was highly active with treatment results comparable to other standard regimens. Increased doses of both paclitaxel and carboplatin could probably be tolerated and are currently being evaluated. Precise definition of the role of paclitaxel in the treatment of small cell lung carcinoma awaits the results of randomized studies.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and topotecan i
✍ John D. Hainsworth; Lisa H. Morrissey; Daniel C. Scullin Jr.; Gerry Ann Houston; πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 83 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of a novel three‐drug regimen containing paclitaxel, carboplatin, and topotecan followed by oral etoposide in the first‐line treatment of patients with small cell lung carcinoma. ## METHO

Phase II trial of paclitaxel, estramusti
✍ David C. Smith; Christopher H. Chay; Rodney L. Dunn; Jude Fardig; Peg Esper; Kar πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 127 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND Preclinical data suggest that the combination of intravenous (i.v.) paclitaxel, carboplatin, oral etoposide, and oral estramustine (TEEC) has significant activity in patients with advanced, hormone‐refractory prostate carcinoma. The authors conducted this clinical trial t

Cisplatin, etoposide, and mitomycin in t
✍ Stephen Davis; Maurizio Tomato; Lucio Crino; Mari Antonetta Colozza; Kenneth Lub πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1986 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 192 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

A total of 39 patients with non-small cell carcinoma of the lung (NSCL) were treated with cisplatin, etoposide, and mitomycin. A major response rate (complete response + partial response) was seen in 15 patients (39%). Median survival for all patients was 340 days; median survival of the responding

Treatment of small cell lung carcinoma i
✍ Esther Dajczman; Li Yi Fu; David Small; Norman Wolkove; Harvey Kreisman πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 625 KB

## BACKGROUND. The number of elderly people with small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is increasing and currently nearly 25% are older than 70 years. Elderly patients may not tolerate intensive therapy and, therefore, often do not receive such treatment. Additionally, age may be an independent predicto

Treatment of small cell carcinoma of the
✍ Nixon, Daniel W. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1984 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 282 KB

The COPP regimen (cyclophosphamide, Oncovin, procarbazine, prednisone) was one of the first chemotherapy programs to prolong survival in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) significantly. Results with this regimen in 50 patients with SCLC show an overall median survival of 10 months. Survival was decrease