𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

P1.29: Evaluation of a newborn hearing screening programme

✍ Scribed by Eva Grill; K. Uus; F. Hessel; R. S. Taylor; J. Wasem; J. Bamford


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
76 KB
Volume
46
Category
Article
ISSN
0323-3847

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Children with congenital hearing impairment benefit from early detection and treatment of their hearing loss . A pilot phase of a Newborn Hearing Screening Programme (NHSP) by the British National Health Service aims at early detection of hearing impairment in new-borns and includes sites where the screening is performed by Health Visitors at a home visit (community-based screening, C), in contrast to the 'hospital based' (H) model where babies are screened in maternity hospital. Objective: To predict the costs and benefits for hospital and community-based systems in England with regard to the effects of alterations to parameter values. Design: Cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model ). Data Sources: Preliminary data on costs and screen performance from the phase one implementation and published diagnostic studies. Target Population: All newborns. Time Horizon: 6 and 120 months. Perspective: Health care system. Compared Strategies: H and C. Outcome Measures: Quality adjusted detected child months (QCM) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Both H and C yielded 794 QCM at the age of 6 months with total costs of 3,69 Mio Β£ per 100,000 screened children in H and 3,34 Mio Β£ in C. In Monte Carlo simulation costs would be lower in H in 48% of the trials. Prevalence of hearing impairment had the most important influence on costs per QCM. Extremes analyses showed that any statistically significant difference between H and C in prevalence, test sensitivity, test specificity and costs would result in significant differences in cost-effectiveness between H and C. ICERs for extreme values are presented. The cost-effectiveness of H and C did not differ significantly but did indicate the high level of uncertainty in the estimates. Projected costs per detected child were comparable to the costs found by other newborn hearing screening models . As a part of ongoing research the NHSP evaluation aims to identify factors predicting a favourable cost-effectiveness ratio.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Outpatient newborn hearing screening
✍ Thomas A Littman; Douglas D Backous πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 53 KB
Evaluation of a diabetic foot screening
✍ McCabe, C.J.; Stevenson, R.C.; Dolan, A.M. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 57 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

We set out to evaluate a clinical foot-screening programme in terms of primary outcomes (reductions in the incidence of ulcers and lower limb amputation) and process outcomes (compliance with screening, the number of patients not completing the programme and the use of chiropody services and prescri

National evaluation of US newborn screen
✍ Therrell, Bradford L. ;Hannon, W. Harry πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 236 KB

## Abstract Newborn screening has existed as a state‐based public health service since the early 1960s. Every state and most territorial jurisdictions have comprehensive newborn screening programs in place, but in the United States a national newborn screening policy does not exist. This results in

Impact of newborn hearing screening : Co
✍ Birgit Philips; Paul Corthals; Leo De Raeve; Wendy D'haenens; Leen Maes; Annelie πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 131 KB

## Abstract ## Objectives/Hypothesis: To evaluate the impact of a newborn hearing screening program on the management and outcome of deaf children and to identify underlying factors that may be responsible for the differences between high and low performing implanted children. ## Study Design: R