𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Outpatient therapy with oral ofloxacin for patients with low risk neutropenia and fever : A prospective, randomized clinical trial

✍ Scribed by Manuel Hidalgo; Javier Hornedo; Carlos Lumbreras; José M. Trigo; Ramón Colomer; Sofía Perea; Carlos Gómez; Ana Ruiz; Rocio García-Carbonero; Hernán Cortés-Funes


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
90 KB
Volume
85
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Background:

Hospitalization and treatment with broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics is the standard care for patients with neutropenia and fever. this randomized clinical trial evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of ambulatory care with oral ofloxacin for patients with low risk, chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and fever.

Methods:

Patients with solid tumors who were treated with conventional dose chemotherapy, presented with fever (axillary temperature >38 degrees c on 2 occasions or >38.5 degrees c on a single occasion) and neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, <500 cells/microl), and met low risk criteria were eligible for this study. they were randomized either to hospitalization and treatment with broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics, which consisted of a combination of cefazidime and amikacin, or to outpatient treatment with oral ofloxacin. the definitions of fever of unknown origin, clinical and microbiologic infection, success, success with modification, and failure were the usual ones for this type of study.

Results:

One hundred episodes were randomized, and 95 were evaluable (47 were randomized to ceftazidime/amikacin and 48 to ofloxacin). baseline characteristics, as well as the proportion of patients with microbiologic and clinical infections, were similar in the two groups. in 91% of episodes in the inpatient group and 89% in the ofloxacin group, patients recovered uneventfully (p=1; 95% ci for the difference, -0.09 to 0.13), with 2 and 5 patients requiring modification of the antibiotics, respectively. eight percent of episodes in the control group and 10.4% in the experimental group resulted in treatment failure. eight patients (16%) in the outpatient group experienced failure with ambulatory care and were admitted to the hospital.

Conclusions:

Outpatient oral antibiotic therapy with oral ofloxacin for patients with low risk neutropenia and fever is safe and similar in efficacy to hospitalization and treatment with broad-spectrum parenteral antibiotics.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Oral ciprofloxacin vs. intravenous ceftr
✍ Petrilli, Antonio S�rgio; Dantas, Lenice Silva; Campos, M�nica Cypriano; Tanaka, 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 98 KB 👁 2 views

Background. Infections are one of the major complications in children undergoing chemotherapy. Monotherapy with either ciprofloxacin or ceftriaxone is safe and efficient in low-risk patients (solid tumors and stage I/II lymphomas). The same drugs may be used in an outpatient setting, decreasing cost

Randomized clinical trial of low molecul
✍ A. Howard; D. Zaccagnini; M. Ellis; A. Williams; A. H. Davies; R. M. Greenhalgh 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 95 KB

## Abstract ## Background This was a randomized clinical trial to determine the efficacy and safety of a ‘blanket’ protocol of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and the best length of antiembolism stocking, for every patient requiring surgery under general anaesthesia. ## Methods Of 426 patien

A brief pain management program compared
✍ Whitehurst, D. G. T. ;Lewis, M. ;Yao, G. L. ;Bryan, S. ;Raftery, J. P. ;Mullis, 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 119 KB

## Abstract ## Objective Guidelines for the management of acute low back pain in primary care recommend early intervention to address psychosocial risk factors associated with long‐term disability. We assessed the cost utility and cost effectiveness of a brief pain management program (BPM) targeti