Objective: To test the hypothesis that there are disparate outcomes of patients undergoing free tissue transfers of the head and neck in 3 different hospital populations; private, public (county) and veterans administration (VA). Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Methods: Reviewed were the c
Outcomes comparison of head and neck free tissue transfers in three different hospital populations
β Scribed by Larry L. Myers
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 84 KB
- Volume
- 29
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0738-1085
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Background: There are no previous studies investigating the outcomes (medical complications, surgical complications, and overall survival) of patients undergoing free tissue transfers of the head and neck in three different hospital populations: private, public (county), and veterans administration (VA). Subjects: Consecutive patients who underwent free tissue transfers of the head and neck by a single surgeon between July 2000 and July 2008. Methods: Data were reviewed for preβoperative variables (prior irradiation and chemotherapy, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score); free tissue transfer characteristics (flap area, harvest and ischemia times); intraβoperative variables (estimated blood loss, fluid administration); postoperative variables (medical/surgical complications, intensive care unit (ICU) and total hospital days); and posttreatment mortality. Results: There were 57, 47, and 61 patients comprising the study populations at the private hospital, public hospital, and VA hospital, respectively. Statistically significant factors were: age (mean years: 64.1, 51.9, and 62.6; P < 0.0001), intraoperative fluid administration (mean mL: 4,945, 6,273, 6,113; P = 0.008), ICU days (2.4, 2.0, 7.7; P < 0.0001), and total hospital days (9.5, 11.5, 17.0; P = 0.0002). Four (7%), five (11%), and four patients (7%), respectively, experienced total flap loss requiring an additional flap (P = ns). Prior irradiation and/or chemotherapy, ASA score, and free tissue transfer characteristics did not differ significantly among the hospital populations. There were no significant differences in posttreatment KaplanβMeier survival curves (P = 0.299). Conclusion: Free tissue transfer can and should be performed in different hospital populations with comparably high rates of success. Theauthor maintained a high level of participation in the surgeries and postoperative care across the different hospital settings. Β© 2009 WileyβLiss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2009.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Objectives/Hypothesis: The primary objective of the study was to determine the frequency of intraoperative vasopressor administration among patients undergoing free tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction, and the secondary objective was to determine the impact of intraoperativ
## Abstract ## Background The Veterans Affairs (VA) population is considered to have generally poorer health than its nonβVA counterpart. ## Methods We reviewed our experience with 55 consecutive patients undergoing free tissue transfers for head and neck reconstruction at the Dallas VA Hospital
A comparative study was conducted of the results of venous end-to-end and end-to-side anastomosis in 948 clinical cases of microvascular free-tissue transfers for head and neck reconstruction following tumor resection. End-to-side anastomosis to the internal jugular vein was achieved uneventfully in
## Abstract **__Background__**: The fasciocutaneous internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) island flap allows for superior esthetical and functional skin cover in the head and neck region in combination with limited donor site morbidity. Its modification as a free flap allows reconstruction of m