Outcome of post–liver transplant ischemic and nonischemic biliary stenoses treated with percutaneous interventions: The bologna experience

✍ Scribed by Emanuela Giampalma; Matteo Renzulli; Cristina Mosconi; Giorgio Ercolani; Antonio Daniele Pinna; Rita Golfieri

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2012
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 288 KB
• Volume: 18
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 1527-6465
• DOI: 10.1002/lt.22450

✦ Synopsis

In liver transplantation (LT), biliary strictures (BSs) are among the most common complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous treatments in the management of post-LT BSs. Between 1999 and 2007, 48 patients underwent percutaneous treatments for posttransplant BSs. We divided the population into 2 groups according to the cause [ischemic (n ¼ 14) or nonischemic (n ¼ 34)] and into further subgroups according to the site [anastomotic (n ¼ 34) or nonanastomotic (n ¼ 14)]. All patients were treated with bilioplasty; in 9 patients who were refractory to bilioplasty, metallic stents were implanted. A technical success rate of 90% was achieved without differences between the ischemic and nonischemic groups or between the anastomotic and nonanastomotic subgroups (P ¼ 0.10). The major complication rate was 4%. The overall 1-and 3-year primary patency rates were 94% and 45%, respectively, and better results were found for patients with nonischemic stenoses versus patients with ischemic stenoses (P ¼ 0.032). The overall secondary patency rates were 94% and 83% at 1 and 3 years, respectively, and there were no statistical differences between the ischemic and nonischemic groups or between the anastomotic and nonanastomotic groups. In the stent subgroup, the overall primary 1-and 2-year patency rates were 100% and 71%, respectively, and the secondary patency rates were 100% and 100%, respectively. In conclusion, a percutaneous approach is highly effective for the treatment of post-LT BSs, and the best results are obtained for patients with simple, nonischemic BSs (technical success rate ¼ 94%, 3-year primary patency rate ¼ 81%, 3-year secondary patency rate ¼ 75%). For patients with ischemic BSs, closer follow-up and retreatment are more frequently needed to achieve secondary patency rates comparable to (or even better than) those for patients with nonischemic stenoses.