✦ LIBER ✦

Otolith accretion rates: Does size really matter?

✍ Scribed by K. Hüssy

Book ID: 113703676
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2008
Tongue: English
Weight: 607 KB
Volume: 362
Category: Article
ISSN: 0022-0981
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2008.06.016

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Does size really matter?

✍ Frantz, Simon; Smaglik, Paul 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 Nature Publishing Group 🌐 English ⚖ 68 KB

When size really does matter

✍ Michael R. Deschenes 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Cambridge University Press 🌐 English ⚖ 151 KB

Pony measurement: Size really does matte

Pony measurement: Size really does matter

✍ John McEwen; Paul Farrington 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 89 KB

Does Coronary Artery Size Really Matter?

✍ Turgay Celik; Atila Iyisoy; Hurkan Kursaklioglu; Sedat Kose; Selim Kilic; Basri 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 150 KB

Does size or frequency really matter?

✍ Mark W. Mahowald 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 65 KB

The anomaly of size: Does it really matt

The anomaly of size: Does it really matter?

✍ Ian M. Dobbs 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 176 KB 👁 2 views

Recent work on the 'size effect' suggests that size-related regularities in asset prices (such as size, leverage, book to market equity, etc.) should not be regarded as anomalies. This paper first clarifies the argument (by showing why the OLS cross-section regression incorporating size-related vari