๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Orthopaedic surgeons, scientists, and industry

โœ Scribed by Joseph A. Buckwalter; Timothy M. Wright


Book ID
102398521
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Weight
43 KB
Volume
26
Category
Article
ISSN
0736-0266

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Twenty-five years ago, the Orthopaedic Research Society established the Journal of Orthopaedic Research to promote original investigations and disseminate important new scientific findings concerning the musculoskeletal system. The Society can take great pride in the success of the Journal and its continuing growth. However, translating advances in orthopaedic research into advances in patient care commonly requires substantial investments in the development, production, distribution, and evaluation of implants, instruments, medications, and increasingly biologically active molecules, matrices, and cells. These investments must come from commercial entities. Thus, orthopaedic surgeons and scientists must collaborate with these entities to translate their research into products that will improve patient care. At the same time, orthopaedic surgeons and scientists need to be cognizant of the potential for true or perceived conflicts of interest that could adversely affect patients and compromise the integrity of our health care system, including biomedical research and education. To help clarify the issues facing orthopaedic surgeons who work with industry, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons prepared Standards of Pro-fessionalism on Orthopaedist-Industry Conflicts of Interest. An assembly of orthopaedic journal editors and Mark Wieting, Chief Education Officer of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, wrote the following editorial to present and explain the issues related to these standards. Although many readers of the Journal of Orthopaedic Research are not practicing orthopaedic surgeons, we felt that all of us with a commitment to orthopaedic research should be aware of standards of professionalism developed by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. We also believe that, like orthopaedic surgeons, orthopaedic scientists working with industry should be aware of the potential for conflicts of interest, and that the orthopaedic research community should consider developing standards for relationships between orthopaedic scientists and commercial entities.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The orthopaedic surgeon scientist: An en
โœ S. R. Hurwitz; J. A. Buckwalter ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 207 KB

is recruiting academic orthopaedic surgeons with specialty training in hand surgery, sports medicine, joint replacemenl, and spine surgery at the levels of assistant and associate professor. Applicants should have interests in clinical care, teaching, and basic research. Few gatherings of academic

Clopidogrel dilemma for orthopaedic surg
โœ Mitchell J. Steele; John S. Fox; John P. Fletcher; Leeanne E. Grigg; Gordon Bell ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2011 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 486 KB
Engineers and Scientists in Industry
โœ HOOKER, S. G.; KURTI, N. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1968 ๐Ÿ› Nature Publishing Group ๐ŸŒ English โš– 393 KB
Surgeons and scientists: Working togethe
โœ Alison P. Murdoch ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 40 KB

## Abstract Most surgeons in academic hospitals will have had a request from an enthusiastic research scientist to take samples of tissue during an operation. It seems reasonable and most patients will respond positively. But of course it is not quite that simple. The regulation of donation of huma