Ordering the alternatives of a strategic plan for Valencia (Spain)
✍ Scribed by Pablo Aragonés; Eliseo Gómez-Senent; Juan P. Pastor
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 698 KB
- Volume
- 10
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1057-9214
- DOI
- 10.1002/mcda.297
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
In this article we present an evaluation of the initiatives involved in a Strategic Plan for Valencia City (Spain) by applying a method to assist Multi‐Criteria Decision‐Making. The complexity of the case lies in the size of the problem, 47 alternatives and 10 criteria, as well as the need to reach a consensus on the final result. The method followed, which has been named PRES Multi‐expert, can be generalized and applied to other complex cases. Thirteen experts have participated in the process, representing different political and social groups of the City, a group of analysts, formed by three lecturers from the Polytechnic University of Valencia, and a consultant, representing the City Hall of Valencia. The PRES algorithm was used to order the alternatives developed in 1992 by Gómez‐Senent at this University. In this article we highlight the advantages of applying the Multi‐Criteria Decision‐Making Aid techniques and the importance of following a procedure to select the criteria, pondering on them and evaluating the alternatives. This procedure ensures that the parties interested in or affected by the decision take part in deciding what measures to adopt. The Multi‐expert PRES method facilitates this participation and can be adapted to different types of problems. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
A medical workstation for the evaluation of alternative 3D radiotherapy plans is described. Our system can simultaneously apply qualitative as well as quantitative evaluation methods to as many as three 3D dose distributions. The user interface of the workstation has been designed with the demands o
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The purpose of the current study was to provide health professionals, professional organizations, policy makers, and the general public with a practical blueprint for increasing the practice of screening for colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and adenomatous polyps over the next