Studies concerned with the evaluation of information systems have typically relied on judgments of relevance as the fundamental measure in determining system performance. In most cases, subjects are asked to assign a relevance score using some category rating scale (l-4, l-11, or simply relevant/non
Order effect in relevance judgment
โ Scribed by Yunjie Xu; Dong Wang
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 770 KB
- Volume
- 59
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1532-2882
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Research in information science now regards users' relevance judgment as subjective perception. However, userโcentered studies in the extant literature mainly focus on relevance judgment in problem solving contexts in which the situational relevance of a document is the main concern for
Research has shown that the judged probability of an event depends on the speciยฎcity with which the focal and alternative hypotheses are described. In particular, unpacking the components of the focal hypothesis generally increases the judged probability of the focal hypothesis, while unpacking the
This research tested the hypothesis that when individuals ยฎrst answer a question about relative evaluation, i.e. the degree in which they feel they are better or worse o than comparison others and next a question about general evaluation, i.e. the general judgment of one's situation or one's charact