✦ LIBER ✦

Oral misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for induction of labor

✍ Scribed by E.J. Langenegger; H.J. Odendaal; D. Grové

Book ID: 116553253
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2005
Tongue: English
Weight: 292 KB
Volume: 88
Category: Article
ISSN: 0020-7292
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.12.005

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Induction of labor with intravaginal mis

Induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone

✍ K. Özgür; A. Kizilates; M. Üner; O. Erman; B. Trak 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 35 KB

Oral Misoprostol and Intracervical Dinop

Oral Misoprostol and Intracervical Dinoprostone for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction: A Randomized Comparison

✍ Cara J Krulewitch 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 19 KB

Oral misoprostol and intracervical dinop

Oral misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized comparison

✍ Jose L Bartha; Rafael Comino-Delgado; Fatima Garcia-Benasach; Pilar Martinez-Del 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 🌐 English ⚖ 167 KB

Oral misoprostol appears to be superior

Oral misoprostol appears to be superior to intracervical dinoprostone for labour induction,

📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Adis International Limited (now part of Wolters Kl ⚖ 151 KB

Misoprostol vs Dinoprostone for Labor In

Misoprostol vs Dinoprostone for Labor Induction

✍ WR Mundle; DC Young 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology 🌐 English ⚖ 351 KB

Randomized trial of intracervical versus

Randomized trial of intracervical versus posterior fornix dinoprostone for induction of labor

✍ Michelle Y. Perry; W.Lynn Leaphart 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 🌐 English ⚖ 51 KB