𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Optimizing the intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio of MRI strip detectors

✍ Scribed by Ananda Kumar; Paul A. Bottomley


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
843 KB
Volume
56
Category
Article
ISSN
0740-3194

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

An MRI detector is formed from a conducting strip separated by a dielectric substrate from a ground plane, and tuned to a quarter‐wavelength. By distributing discrete tuning elements along the strip, the geometric design may be adjusted to optimize the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) for a given application. Here a numerical electromagnetic (EM) method of moments (MoM) is applied to determine the length, width, substrate thickness, dielectric constant, and number of tuning elements that yield the best intrinsic SNR (ISNR) of the strip detector at 1.5 Tesla. The central question of how strip performance compares with that of a conventional optimized loop coil is also addressed. The numerical method is validated against the known ISNR performance of loop coils, and its ability to predict the tuning capacitances and performance of seven experimental strip detectors of varying length, width, substrate thickness, and dielectric constant. We find that strip detectors with low‐dielectric constant, moderately thin‐substrate, and length about 1.3 (±0.2) times the depth of interest perform best. The ISNR of strips is comparable to that of loops (i.e., higher close to the detector but lower at depth). The SNR improves with two inherently‐decoupled strips, whose sensitivity profile is well‐suited to parallel MRI. The findings are summarized as design “rules of thumb.” Magn Reson Med 56:, 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Ultimate intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio
✍ Michael A. Ohliger; Aaron K. Grant; Daniel K. Sodickson 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 559 KB

## Abstract A method is described for establishing an upper bound on the spatial encoding capabilities of coil arrays in parallel MRI. Ultimate intrinsic signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), independent of any particular conductor arrangement, is calculated by expressing arbitrary coil sensitivities in ter

The intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in N
✍ W. A. Edelstein; G. H. Glover; C. J. Hardy; R. W. Redington 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 757 KB

The fundamental limit for NMR imaging is set by an intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for a particular combination of rf antenna and imaging subjects. The intrinsic SNR is the signal from a small volume of material in the sample competing with electrical noise from thermally generated, random noi

Analytic expressions for the ultimate in
✍ E. Kopanoglu; V. B. Erturk; E. Atalar 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 238 KB

## Abstract The ultimate intrinsic signal‐to‐noise ratio is the highest possible signal‐to‐noise ratio, and the ultimate intrinsic specific absorption rate provides the lowest limit of the specific absorption rate for a given flip angle distribution. Analytic expressions for ultimate intrinsic sign

Optimizing MRI signal-to-noise ratio for
✍ Birgit L. Sorgenfrei; William A. Edelstein 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 603 KB

## Abstract Using separate preamplifiers for the two outputs of a quadrature receive coil (and then combining the preamplifier outputs in a quadrature hybrid) provides a better signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) than is obtained by directly combining the quadrature outputs in a hybrid followed by a single

Tissue conductivity modifies the magneti
✍ Thomas H. Foster 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 144 KB

## Abstract Inclusion of a frequency‐dependent tissue conductivity in the calculation of the magnetic resonance imaging signal‐to‐noise ratio is considered. The linear dependence of field strength described previously by Edelstein is preserved for frequencies up to ≈60 MHz. At higher frequencies, t