Optimization of microwave devices combining topology gradient and genetic algorithm
✍ Scribed by Atousa Assadihaghi; Stéphane Bila; Dominique Baillargeat; Michel Aubourg; Serge Verdeyme; Christelle Boichon; Jérôme Puech; Luc Lapierre
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 426 KB
- Volume
- 18
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1096-4290
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Topology optimization can be seen as optimizing a distribution of small topological elements within a domain with respect to given specifications. A numerical topology gradient (TG) algorithm is applied in the context of electromagnetism for optimizing microwave devices, computing the sensitivity on adding or removing small metallic elements. This method leads to an optimum topology with very little initial information in acceptable time consumption. The method is applied to the design of a microstrip component in which the topology gradient is directly used as a direction of descent. However, in some ill-behavior problems, topology gradient is not sufficient to converge to the global optimum. In the latter case, the basic TG is coupled with a genetic algorithm (GA) to make a more suitable algorithm for solving local optima problems. V
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Lifeline systems, such as water distribution and gas supply networks, usually cover large areas. For these systems, seismic design is always a difficult problem because of the complexity of large‐scale networks. In this paper, a topology optimization technology for lifeline networks is
## Abstract A numerical model defined by a finite element method coupled with a topology gradient method is used for optimizing the shape of microwave components with respect to electrical specifications. The approach, which consists in minimizing a cost function with respect to the physical proper
The finite element method is coupled with the topology gradient (TG) and levelset (LS) methods for optimizing the shape of microwave components using a computer-aided design model. On the one hand, the LS approach is based on the classical shape derivative; while on the other hand, the TG method is