Optimal Response-Adaptive Designs for Normal Responses
β Scribed by Atanu Biswas; Rahul Bhattacharya
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 97 KB
- Volume
- 51
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0323-3847
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Most of the available responseβadaptive designs in phase III clinical trial set up are not from any optimal consideration. An optimal design for binary responses is given by Rosenberger et al. (2001) and an optimal design for continuous responses is provided by Biswas and Mandal (2004). Recently, Zhang and Rosenberger (2006) [ZR] provided another design for normal responses. Biswas, Bhattacharya and Zhang (2007) pointed out that the design of ZR is not suitable for normally distributed responses, or any distribution having the possibility of negative mean, in general. But they only indicated the problem and bypassed the original problem and set up. In the present paper, we first start with the drawback of ZR. We then provide the appropriate optimal responseβadaptive design for normal or continuous distributions which provides the necessary correction for the ZR problem. The proposed methods are illustrated using some real data (Β© 2009 WILEYβVCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Typically in the analysis of industrial data for product/process optimization, there are many response variables that are under investigation at the same time. Robustness is also an important concept in industrial optimization. Here, robustness means that the responses are not sensitive
## Abstract We consider a response adaptive design of clinical trials with a varianceβpenalized criterion. It is shown that this criterion evaluates the performance of a response adaptive design based on both the number of patients assigned to the better treatment and the power of the statistical t
Response surface methodology can be used to construct global and midrange approximations to functions in structural optimization. Since structural optimization requires expensive function evaluations, it is important to construct accurate function approximations so that rapid convergence may be achi
Optimal classification formulation is adapted to the context of discrimination when the response is ordinal. The resulting method, optimal discriminant analysis for ordinal responses (ODAO), is presented and compared with two reference discrimination techniques used in this context (proportional-odd
## Abstract Within the realm of average mean squared error (AMSE), generalized estimation (GE; Kupper and Meydrech 1,2) is an attractive alternative to estimate the response surface. GE is based on the criterion that minimizes the variance of the fitted response $(\hat Y({\bf x}))$ by weighting the