𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Optimal Response-Adaptive Designs for Normal Responses

✍ Scribed by Atanu Biswas; Rahul Bhattacharya


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
97 KB
Volume
51
Category
Article
ISSN
0323-3847

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Most of the available response‐adaptive designs in phase III clinical trial set up are not from any optimal consideration. An optimal design for binary responses is given by Rosenberger et al. (2001) and an optimal design for continuous responses is provided by Biswas and Mandal (2004). Recently, Zhang and Rosenberger (2006) [ZR] provided another design for normal responses. Biswas, Bhattacharya and Zhang (2007) pointed out that the design of ZR is not suitable for normally distributed responses, or any distribution having the possibility of negative mean, in general. But they only indicated the problem and bypassed the original problem and set up. In the present paper, we first start with the drawback of ZR. We then provide the appropriate optimal response‐adaptive design for normal or continuous distributions which provides the necessary correction for the ZR problem. The proposed methods are illustrated using some real data (Β© 2009 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Robust optimization for multiple respons
✍ Zhen He; Jing Wang; Jinho Oh; Sung H. Park πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 203 KB

## Abstract Typically in the analysis of industrial data for product/process optimization, there are many response variables that are under investigation at the same time. Robustness is also an important concept in industrial optimization. Here, robustness means that the responses are not sensitive

Response Adaptive Designs with a Varianc
✍ Yanqing Yi; Xikui Wang πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 242 KB

## Abstract We consider a response adaptive design of clinical trials with a variance‐penalized criterion. It is shown that this criterion evaluates the performance of a response adaptive design based on both the number of patients assigned to the better treatment and the power of the statistical t

Response surface approximations for stru
✍ W. J. Roux; Nielen Stander; R. T. Haftka πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 114 KB

Response surface methodology can be used to construct global and midrange approximations to functions in structural optimization. Since structural optimization requires expensive function evaluations, it is important to construct accurate function approximations so that rapid convergence may be achi

OPTIMAL DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS FOR ORDINA
✍ JOΓ‹L COSTE; ERIC WALTER; DANIEL WASSERMAN; ALAIN VENOT πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 198 KB

Optimal classification formulation is adapted to the context of discrimination when the response is ordinal. The resulting method, optimal discriminant analysis for ordinal responses (ODAO), is presented and compared with two reference discrimination techniques used in this context (proportional-odd

AMSE optimal design using generalized es
✍ Shu-Kai S. Fan; Kuo-Nan Huang πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 161 KB

## Abstract Within the realm of average mean squared error (AMSE), generalized estimation (GE; Kupper and Meydrech 1,2) is an attractive alternative to estimate the response surface. GE is based on the criterion that minimizes the variance of the fitted response $(\hat Y({\bf x}))$ by weighting the