𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Optimal margins and lymphadenectomy in colonic cancer surgery

✍ Scribed by Y. Hashiguchi; K. Hase; H. Ueno; H. Mochizuki; E. Shinto; J. Yamamoto


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
133 KB
Volume
98
Category
Article
ISSN
0007-1323

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Background

A standard management policy has not yet been established with respect to the extent of lymphadenectomy for colonic cancer.

Methods

A total of 914 consecutive patients who underwent potentially curative surgery for T2–T4 colonic cancer were reviewed retrospectively. The number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined and the potential contributions to the staging accuracy of the distinct area were analysed. The survival benefit of dissection was compared for pericolic (local), mesocolic (intermediate) and main arterial trunk (main) LN.

Results

Removal of the pericolic LNs within 5 cm of the tumour and intermediate LNs resulted in a mean LN number of 15Β·9, a sensitivity for overall node positivity of 97Β·5 per cent, and a survival benefit calculated as a therapeutic value index of 31Β·4 points. The additional removal of LNs more than 5 cm from the tumour and main LNs did not improve the staging accuracy, while adding only 3Β·4 points to the survival benefit.

Conclusion

Current guidelines may encourage needlessly extensive surgery. Clinical trials to establish the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy are warranted.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Distal spread of rectal cancer and optim
✍ Kazuo Shirouzu; Hiroharu Isomoto; Teruo Kakegawa πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1995 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 506 KB

Background. Ascertaining the optimal distal margin of resection in sphincter-preserving surgery has become an important problem. This study was designed to examine distal rectal spread of rectal carcinoma and to determine the optimal distal margin of resection for sphincterpreserving surgery. Metho