Optimal margins and lymphadenectomy in colonic cancer surgery
β Scribed by Y. Hashiguchi; K. Hase; H. Ueno; H. Mochizuki; E. Shinto; J. Yamamoto
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 133 KB
- Volume
- 98
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0007-1323
- DOI
- 10.1002/bjs.7518
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Background
A standard management policy has not yet been established with respect to the extent of lymphadenectomy for colonic cancer.
Methods
A total of 914 consecutive patients who underwent potentially curative surgery for T2βT4 colonic cancer were reviewed retrospectively. The number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined and the potential contributions to the staging accuracy of the distinct area were analysed. The survival benefit of dissection was compared for pericolic (local), mesocolic (intermediate) and main arterial trunk (main) LN.
Results
Removal of the pericolic LNs within 5 cm of the tumour and intermediate LNs resulted in a mean LN number of 15Β·9, a sensitivity for overall node positivity of 97Β·5 per cent, and a survival benefit calculated as a therapeutic value index of 31Β·4 points. The additional removal of LNs more than 5 cm from the tumour and main LNs did not improve the staging accuracy, while adding only 3Β·4 points to the survival benefit.
Conclusion
Current guidelines may encourage needlessly extensive surgery. Clinical trials to establish the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy are warranted.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Background. Ascertaining the optimal distal margin of resection in sphincter-preserving surgery has become an important problem. This study was designed to examine distal rectal spread of rectal carcinoma and to determine the optimal distal margin of resection for sphincterpreserving surgery. Metho