𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Ontogenetic changes in forager polymorphism and foraging ecology in the leaf-cutting antAtta cephalotes

✍ Scribed by J. K. Wetterer


Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Weight
493 KB
Volume
98
Category
Article
ISSN
0029-8549

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


In the leaf-cutting ant Atta cephalotes (L.) small colonies produce a relatively narrow size-range of small workers, whereas large colonies produce a much wider size-range of workers. In this study, I compared the foraging of four small A. cephalotes colonies (fewer than 5000 workers) with published data on foraging of large colonies to examine how colony size and worker size-range may be related to foraging ecology in leaf-cutting ants. I found that the foraging ecology of small A. cephalotes colonies is very different from that of large colonies. In small colonies, a relatively narrow size-range of foragers (1.4-6.7 mg, mean 3.3 mg) cut primarily "herbs" (ferns, grasses, and other small herbaceous plants) located within 7 m of the nest. In contrast, in large colonies, a broader size-range of workers (1.4-30 mg, mean 7.3 mg) participate in foraging, generally harvesting from trees 20-80 m from the nest, with larger workers cutting on trees with thicker and tougher leaves. Small colonies' dependence on small herbaceous plants near the nest may have a profound impact on distribution of A. cephalotes. A. cephalotes colonies are rarely found in primary forest, where the low occurrence of small herbaceous plants in the understory may preclude the establishment of young colonies.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Forager size and ecology ofAcromyrmex co
✍ James K. Wetterer πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1995 πŸ› Springer-Verlag 🌐 English βš– 804 KB

I compare forager size and foraging ecology of the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex coronatus (Fabricius) with published data on three other leaf-cutter species in Costa Rica, Atta cephalotes (L.), Acromyrmex octospinosus (Reich), and Acromyrmex volcanus Wheeler. Intra-and interspecific differences in fo