We show that the axiomatization given by Levesque for his logic of "only knowing" [ 21, which he showed to be sound and complete for the unquantified version of the logic and conjectured to be complete for the full logic, is in fact incomplete.
Only knowing with degrees of confidence
✍ Scribed by Arild Waaler; Johan W. Klüwer; Tore Langholm; Espen H. Lian
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 351 KB
- Volume
- 5
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1570-8683
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
A new logic of belief (in the "only knowing" family) with confidence levels is presented. The logic allows a natural distinction between explicit and implicit belief representations, where the explicit form directly expresses its models. The explicit form can be found by applying a set of equivalence preserving rewriting rules to the implicit form. The rewriting process is performed entirely within the logic, on the object level, provided we supply an explicit formalization of the logical space. We prove that the problem of deciding whether there exists a consistent explicit form is p 2 -complete, a complexity class to which many problems of nonmonotonic reasoning belong. The article also contains a conceptual analysis of basic notions like belief, co-belief and degrees of confidence.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
We study reasoning in Levesque's logic of only knowing. In particular, we first prove that extending a decidable subset of first-order logic with the ability of reasoning about only knowing preserves decidability of reasoning, as long as quantifying-in is not allowed in the language, and define a ge
Recent accounts of feeling of knowing (FOK) judgements assume that they arise from an assessment of cue familiarity, whilst retrospective confidence judgements arise from an assessment of the retrieval process. An experiment was conducted to extend this laboratory work to the area of eyewitness memo