One-way permutations and self-witnessing languages
โ Scribed by Christopher M. Homan; Mayur Thakur
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 217 KB
- Volume
- 67
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-0000
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
A desirable property of one-way functions is that they be total, one-to-one, and onto-in other words, that they be permutations. We prove that one-way permutations exist exactly if PaUP-coUP: This provides the first characterization of the existence of one-way permutations based on a complexity-class separation and shows that their existence is equivalent to a number of previously studied complexitytheoretic hypotheses. We study permutations in the context of witness functions of nondeterministic Turing machines. A language is in PermUP if, relative to some unambiguous, nondeterministic, polynomial-time Turing machine accepting the language, the function mapping each string to its unique witness is a permutation of the members of the language. We show that, under standard complexity-theoretic assumptions, PermUP is a strict subset of UP. We study SelfNP, the set of all languages such that, relative to some nondeterministic, polynomial-time Turing machine that accepts the language, the set of all witnesses of strings in the language is identical to the language itself. We show that SATASelfNP; and, under standard complexity-theoretic assumptions, SelfNPaNP:
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
A checking automaton is equivalent to a one-way nonerasing stack automaton which, once it enters its stack, never again writes on its stack. The checking automaton languages (cal) form a full AFL closed under substitution. If L C a\* is an infinite cal, then L contains an infinite regular set. Conse