✦ LIBER ✦

On the Validity of the Born−Oppenheimer Separation and the Accuracy of Diagonal Corrections in Anharmonic Molecular Vibrations†

✍ Scribed by Hirata, So; Miller, Edward B.; Ohnishi, Yu-ya; Yagi, Kiyoshi

Book ID: 115528159
Publisher: American Chemical Society
Year: 2009
Tongue: English
Weight: 643 KB
Volume: 113
Category: Article
ISSN: 1089-5639
DOI: 10.1021/jp903375d

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Born-Oppenheimer failure in the separati

Born-Oppenheimer failure in the separation of low-frequency molecular vibrations

✍ Mills, Ian M. 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 American Chemical Society 🌐 English ⚖ 611 KB

Accuracy of the adiabatic and Born—Oppen

Accuracy of the adiabatic and Born—Oppenheimer methods in the vibrational problem

✍ Jan Makarewicz; Andrzej Wierzbicki 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 566 KB

On the Order of Accuracy of the Born-Opp

On the Order of Accuracy of the Born-Oppenheimer Approximation for Molecular Collision States

✍ Gerber, R. B. 📂 Article 📅 1969 🏛 The Royal Society 🌐 English ⚖ 791 KB

The diagonal correction to the Born–Oppe

The diagonal correction to the Born–Oppenheimer approximation: Its effect on the singlet–triplet splitting of CH2 and other molecular effects

✍ Handy, Nicholas C.; Yamaguchi, Yukio; Schaefer, Henry F. 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 American Institute of Physics 🌐 English ⚖ 561 KB

Analytic calculation of the diagonal Bor

Analytic calculation of the diagonal Born-Oppenheimer correction within configuration-interaction and coupled-cluster theory

✍ Stanton, John F.; Szalay, Péter G.; Gauss, Jürgen; Tajti, Attila; Kállay, Mih 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 American Institute of Physics 🌐 English ⚖ 374 KB

On the Born—Oppenheimer separation and t

On the Born—Oppenheimer separation and the calculation of nonradiative transition rates

✍ K.F. Freed; W.M. Gelbart 📂 Article 📅 1971 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 544 KB

In this paper we discuss the dependence of calculated nonradiative transition rates on the viimnic wavefunctions chosen to describe excited molecular states. We comment on several fallacies and ambiguities in the literature and suggest a simple resolution to the problem.