On the uses of language in working and idealized logic

✍ Scribed by Lenore Langsdorf

• Publisher: Springer Netherlands
• Year: 1990
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 660 KB
• Volume: 4
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0920-427X
• DOI: 10.1007/bf00173967

✦ Synopsis

The interpretation of discourse covers a continuum with two extremes: on the one hand, a text considered as an ideal, distant object, and on the other hand, a conversation regarded as a real, present event. On the basis of a distinction between relatively context-invariant propositions and relatively context-dependent statements, it is argued that statements in conversational discourse are easier to interpret than statements in texts, whereas only propositions in symbolic logic can be interpreted with exactitude. In the same way, the interpretation of dialogical arguments proceeds more easily than the interpretation of arguments in texts. While dialogical argumentation requires a dialectical approach, textual argumentation necessitates an imaginative reconstruction of the argument. From this it can be concluded that for different sorts of argumentative discourse diverse sorts of interpretative activities have to be used.