Experimental evidence for the two-phase theory of fluidization-that all the gas in excess of that required for incipient fluidization rises in the bubble phase-is discussed from two viewpoints. Fist, measurements of the volume flow-rate of bubbles in a two-dimensional fluidized bed are compared with
On the two-phase theory of fluidization
β Scribed by J.R. Grace; R. Clift
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1974
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 786 KB
- Volume
- 29
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0009-2509
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The distribution of gas flow between bubbles and the dense phase in a fluidized bed is considered. By deriving general equations for gas and solids continuity in a freely-bubbling fluidized bed, the possible contributions to the invisible gas flow are formulated. It is shown that the gross assumptions inherent in "two-phase theories" of fluidization are not justified. Measurements of visible bubble flow and bubble volume fraction can give nothing more than rough estimates for the gas flow through the two phases.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Theory is given to predict the value of k in the equation for a bubbling fluidised bed U=kUo+ QB/A; here U is the superficial fluidising velocity, U= U0 at incipient fluidisation, Qn is the observed bubble flow, and A the cross-sectional area of the bed. In the simple two-phase theory, k = 1 ; but t
The lumped model developed m the earher paper, for flmdlzed bed steam-oxygen-char gasdicahon 1s mod&d by takmg mto ConslderaUon the bubblmg nature of the fluid flow The bubbles were assumed to be umform m sue and the computations were carned out treatmg the bubble size as a parameter It was found th