𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

On the transfer and advantageous reallocation paradoxes

✍ Scribed by Milind Rao


Book ID
104655772
Publisher
Springer
Year
1992
Tongue
English
Weight
511 KB
Volume
9
Category
Article
ISSN
0176-1714

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


It is well known that the transfer and advantageous reallocation paradoxes cannot occur at a Walrasian stable equilibrium in a two agent economy. In an influential recent paper Chichilnisky provided an example of the transfer paradox in the context of a globally Walrasian stable three agent economy. It is evident, though, that the paradoxes depend on the underlying data-tastes, preferences and net export positions-of the economy. This paper characterizes and generalizes the transfer and advantageous reallocation paradoxes: necessary and sufficient conditions on the underlying data of a globally Walrasian stable economy for the occurence of each of these paradoxes are established; the key role of the third agent in generating these paradoxes is clarified. * I would like to thank John Donaldson, Duncan Foley and two anonymous referees of this journal for helpful comments. The usual disclaimers apply. This definition follows Donsimoni and Polemarchakis [6].


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Habit Formation And The Transfer Paradox
✍ Ichiro Gombi; Shinsuke Ikeda πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 203 KB
A note on the strategic aspects of the t
✍ Milind Rao πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› Springer 🌐 English βš– 281 KB

It is well known that an agent can be hurt by accepting a gift, the donor of which is made better off. Why then does the recipient accept this welfare reducing gift? This paper examines the strategic aspects of the paradox. It shows that if the recipient refuses the gift, it would suffer an even gre