On the scope and interpretation of the Tofts models for DCE-MRI
โ Scribed by Steven P. Sourbron; David L. Buckley
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 368 KB
- Volume
- 66
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0740-3194
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Abstract
The Tofts model (TM) and extended Tofts model (ETM) have become a standard for the analysis of dynamic contrastโenhanced MRI. In this study, a mathematical analysis is used to identify exactly in which tissue types the Tofts models may be applied. The results show that the TM is accurate if and only if the tissue is weakly vascularised (small blood volume). The ETM is additionally accurate in highly perfused tissues (high blood flow). In tissues that are highly vascularised, or where tracer exchange is very fast or very slow, TM and ETM accurately fit the data but lead to a misinterpretation of the parameters. In tissue types with intermediate vascularity, perfusion and tracer exchange, neither model offers a good fit to the tissue concentrations. A good fit can be obtained with a measured input function by reducing the temporal resolution, but this does not improve the accuracy of the parameters. In conclusion, the Tofts models only produce reliable parameter values if the tissue is weakly vascularized (TM or ETM) or highly perfused (ETM). Without prior knowledge that at least one of these constraints is fulfilled, the physiological interpretation of the values produced by the Tofts models is unclear. Magn Reson Med, 2011. ยฉ 2011 WileyโLiss, Inc.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Dynamic contrastโenhanced MRI has been used in conjunction with tracer kinetics modeling in a wide range of tissues for treatment monitoring, oncology drug development, and investigation of disease processes. Accurate measurement of model parameters relies on acquiring data with high te
## Abstract ## Purpose To evaluate and compare the reproducibility of the preferred phenomenological parameter IAUC~60~ (initial area under the timeโconcentration curve [IAUC] defined over the first 60 seconds postenhancement) with the preferred modeling parameter (__K__^trans^), as derived using
Noise limitation on the detected spatial resolution, described by the Rose Model, is well known in X-ray imaging and routinely used in designing X-ray imaging protocols. The purpose of this article is to revisit the Rose Model in the context of MRI where image data are acquired in the spatial freque