𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

On the relation between the photospheric intensity, velocity and magnetic fields

✍ Scribed by J. M. Beckers; E. H. Schröter

Publisher
Springer
Year
1968
Tongue
English
Weight
114 KB
Volume
4
Category
Article
ISSN
0038-0938

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

By means of a device described elsewhere (BECKERS and SCHROTER, 1968) we obtained spectra of the quiescent photosphere in the Fe line 2 6173 A (9 =2.5) simultaneously in the two opposite circular polarizations. Two sets of spectra with good spatial resolution were selected to measure and to correlate the continuum intensity, the Doppler shift and the magnetic field of small details on the sun.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Local solar magnetic and velocity field
Local solar magnetic and velocity field development and related photospheric and chromospheric activity
✍ V. Bumba 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 595 KB

Abslract. We have conlpiled the resuhs of our long-term studies of the local magnetic lield and ils activily development, derived from investigating stlnspo[ group evolulion, photoelectrically measured Iongiludinal magnetic and velocity fields, and measurements o[ stmspot proper motions. We estimate

Relation between circular polarization o
Relation between circular polarization of moving type IV bursts and polarity of photospheric magnetic fields
✍ Keizo Kai 📂 Article 📅 1978 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 462 KB

Akslraet, Two-dimensional, high-resolution observations of about 30 moving type IV bursts allow us to compare the polarization structure of the radio sources high in the corona with the distribution of magnetic fields measured at the photospheric level. Left-and right-handed circularly polarized mov

Reply to ‘The relations between chromosp
Reply to ‘The relations between chromospheric features and photospheric magnetic fields’ by E. N. Frazier
✍ Peter Foukal; Harold Zirin 📂 Article 📅 1972 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 210 KB

Frazier (1972) has criticized the conclusions of Zirin (1971Zirin ( , 1972)), Veeder and Zirin (1970), and those of Foukal (1971a, b, c) on the relation between He structure and magnetic fields. We wish to reply to these criticisms. Some of the points Frazier mentions refer to statements made by