𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

On the Rate of Approximations for Maximum Likelihood Tests in Change-Point Models

✍ Scribed by Edit Gombay; Lajos Horváth


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Weight
886 KB
Volume
56
Category
Article
ISSN
0047-259X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


We study the asymptotics of maximum-likelihood ratio-type statistics for testing a sequence of observations for no change in parameters against a possible change while some nuisance parameters remain constant over time. We obtain extreme value as well as Gaussian-type approximations for the likelihood ratio. We get necessary and sufficient conditions for the weak convergence of supremum and L p -functionals of the likelihood ration process. We also approximate the maximum likelihood ratio with Ornstein Uhlenbeck processes and obtain bounds for the rate of approximation. We show that the Ornstein Uhlenbeck approach is superior to the extreme value limit in case of moderate sample sizes.

1996 Academic Press, Inc.

1. Approximations for the Likelihood Ratio Process

Let X 1 , X 2 , ..., X n be independent random vectors in R m with distribution functions F(x; % 1 , ' 1 ), ..., F(x; % n , ' n ), where % i # 3 (1) R d and ' i # 3 (2) R p , 1 i n. We want to test

against the change-point alternative

article no.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


A Note on Maximum Likelihood Ratio Test
✍ Prof. S. R. Paul 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 180 KB 👁 2 views

A derivation of the maximum likelihood ratio test for testing no outliere in regreeeion models h given ueing the method of WETEXEILL (1981, pp. 106-107) for estimating the regreeeion parsmetere. This method h eseentially eimilar to the one outlined in B a s m and Lmwm (1978, p. 283), although by our

On Testing for a Change-Point in Varianc
✍ M. Ishaq Bhatti; Jinglong Wang 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 109 KB 👁 3 views

This paper addresses the problem of testing for a change about the variance of sequence of normal random variables with unknown means. It compares the power performance of five tests, namely: L-test based on Lehmann's (1951) U-statistic, B-test based on bayesian method, R-test derived from likelihoo