Erd6s. P. and C.C. Rousseau, The size Ramsey number of a complete bipartite graph, Discrete Mathematics 113 (1993) 259-262. In this note we prove that the (diagonal) size Ramsey number of K,,.,, is bounded below by $2'2".
On the path-complete bipartite Ramsey number
✍ Scribed by Roland Häggkvist
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1989
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 130 KB
- Volume
- 75
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0012-365X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
It is shown that a graph of order N and average degree d that does not contain the book B m =K 1 +K 1, m as a subgraph has independence number at least Nf (d ), where f (x)t(log xÂx) (x Ä ). From this result we find that the book-complete graph Ramsey number satisfies r(B m , K n ) mn 2 Âlog(nÂe). I
A new upper bound is given for the cycle-complete graph Ramsey number r(Cm, K,,), the smallest order for a graph which forces it to contain either a cycle of order m or a set of n independent vertices. Then, another cycle-complete graph Ramsey number is studied, namely r(sCm, K,) the smallest order
The Ramsey numbers M,,, n,P,, ..., n,P,), p > 2, are calculated. ## 1. Introduction One class of generalized Ramsey numbers that are known exactly are those for the graphs nP2 which consist of n disjoint paths of length 2; E. J. Cockayne and the author proved in 111 that d r(nlp2, ..., n d P 2 ) =
Let G be a bipartite graph, with k|e(G). The zero-sum bipartite Ramsey number B(G, Z k ) is the smallest integer t such that in every Z k -coloring of the edges of K t,t , there is a zero-sum mod k copy of G in K t,t . In this article we give the first proof that determines B(G, Z 2 ) for all possib