We derive to which of the three types an irreducible UA representation which is obtained with the procedure of generalised induction belongs. We analyse the question whether or not the irreducible induced UA representations are on standardform. The results hold as well for induced PUA representation
β¦ LIBER β¦
On the notions ofM- andD-induced representations
β Scribed by A. N. Kuzemchikov; A. V. Levichev
- Book ID
- 105464430
- Publisher
- SP MAIK Nauka/Interperiodica
- Year
- 1995
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 245 KB
- Volume
- 36
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0037-4466
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
On the type and the standardform of indu
β
P. M. Broek
π
Article
π
1979
π
Springer
π
English
β 310 KB
Differences in the effects of the antirh
β
S. Mita; K. Matsunaga
π
Article
π
1990
π
SP BirkhΓ€user Verlag Basel
π
English
β 522 KB
Differential effects of the selective D2
β
Ruud Boss; Alexander R. Cools; Sven-Ove Γgren
π
Article
π
1988
π
Springer
π
English
β 517 KB
The effect of the D2-antagonist raclopride was investigated in two test situations, which are presumed to involve dopamine (DA) transmission within the nucleus accumbens of the rat. Local injection of d-amphetamine sulphate (10 gg/0.5 gl) produced a marked increase in motor activity, measured as mot
Induced representations of the full holo
β
H. Kunert; M. SuffczyΕski
π
Article
π
1982
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 183 KB
Erratum: Volume 141, Number 1 (1989), in
π
Article
π
1995
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 24 KB
Series-expansion representation of the r
β
Marsellas L. Waller; Thomas H. Shumpert
π
Article
π
2000
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 217 KB