𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

On the inter-instrument and the inter-laboratory transferability of a tandem mass spectral reference library. 3. Focus on ion trap and upfront CID

✍ Scribed by Herbert Oberacher; Florian Pitterl; Eleni Siapi; Barry R. Steele; Thomas Letzel; Sylvia Grosse; Bernhard Poschner; Franco Tagliaro; Rossella Gottardo; Silvi A. Chacko; Jonathan L. Josephs


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2012
Tongue
English
Weight
338 KB
Volume
47
Category
Article
ISSN
1076-5174

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Mass spectral libraries represent versatile tools for the identification of small bioorganic molecules. Libraries based on electron impact spectra are rated robust and transferable. Tandem mass spectral libraries are often considered to work properly only on the instrument that has been used to build the library. An exception from that rule is the ‘Wiley Registry of Tandem Mass Spectral Data, MSforID’. In various studies with data sets from different kinds of tandem mass spectrometric instruments, the outstanding sensitivity and robustness of this tandem mass spectral library search approach was demonstrated. The instrumental platforms tested, however, mainly included various tandem‐in‐space instruments. Herein, the results of a multicenter study with a focus on upfront and tandem‐in‐time fragmentation are presented. Five laboratories participated and provided fragment ion mass spectra from the following types of mass spectrometers: time‐of‐flight (TOF), quadrupole–hexapole–TOF, linear ion trap (LIT), 3‐D ion trap and LIT–Orbitrap. A total number of 1231 fragment ion mass spectra were collected from 20 test compounds (amiloride, buphenin, cinchocaine, cyclizine, desipramine, dihydroergotamine, dyxirazine, dosulepin, ergotamine, ethambutol, etofylline, mefruside, metoclopramide, phenazone, phentermine, phenytoin, sulfamethoxazole, sulfamoxole, sulthiame and tetracycline) on seven electrospray ionization instruments using 18 different instrumental configurations for fragmentation. For 1222 spectra (99.3%), the correct compound was retrieved as the best matching compound. Classified matches (matches with ‘relative average match probability’ >40.0) were obtained for 1207 spectra (98.1%). This high percentage of correct identifications clearly supports the hypothesis that the tandem mass spectral library approach tested is a robust and universal identification tool. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


On the inter-instrument and inter-labora
✍ Herbert Oberacher; Marion Pavlic; Kathrin Libiseller; Birthe Schubert; Michael S 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 160 KB

## Abstract The inter‐instrument and inter‐laboratory transferability of a tandem mass spectral reference library originally built on a quadrupole‐quadrupole‐time‐of‐flight instrument was examined. The library consisted of 3759 MS/MS spectra collected from 402 reference compounds applying several d

On the inter-instrument and the inter-la
✍ Herbert Oberacher; Marion Pavlic; Kathrin Libiseller; Birthe Schubert; Michael S 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 554 KB

## Abstract A sophisticated matching algorithm developed for highly efficient identity search within tandem mass spectral libraries is presented. For the optimization of the search procedure a collection of 410 tandem mass spectra corresponding to 22 compounds was used. The spectra were acquired in