✦ LIBER ✦

On the geometry of numerical ranges in spaces with an indefinite inner product

✍ Scribed by N. Bebiano; R. Lemos; J. da Providência; G. Soares

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2005
Tongue: English
Weight: 277 KB
Volume: 399
Category: Article
ISSN: 0024-3795
DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2004.04.021

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Spectral inclusion properties of the num

Spectral inclusion properties of the numerical range in a space with an indefinite metric

✍ Deyu Wu; Alatancang Chen 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 176 KB

Certain operator algebras induced by ∗-d

Certain operator algebras induced by ∗-derivations in C∗-algebras on an indefinite inner product space

✍ Schôichi Ôta 📂 Article 📅 1978 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 425 KB

A note on a new description of invariant

A note on a new description of invariant maximal nonnegative subspaces in an indefinite inner product space

✍ André Ran; Frank Uhlig 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 127 KB

On the optimal approximation of bounded

On the optimal approximation of bounded linear functionals in Hilbert spaces with inner product invariant in rotation or translation

✍ Augustin Paulik 📂 Article 📅 1976 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 367 KB

Numerical investigation into influence o

Numerical investigation into influence of geometry on flow in a rotating cavity with an axial throughflow

✍ P.G. Tucker; C.A. Long 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 430 KB

An improvement in the calculation of the

An improvement in the calculation of the magnetic field for an arbitrary geometry coil with rectangular cross section Int. J. Numer. Model. 2005; 18(6):493–504

✍ Slobodan I. Babic; Cevdet Akyel 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 47 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract The above article was published in Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 493–504, (October 2005). A number of imperfections were subsequently identified and have been corrected below. On page 497, the following equation has been corrected to: On page 501, the following equation has been correct