𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

On the existence of tests uniformly more powerful than the likelihood ratio test

✍ Scribed by Wei Liu


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1995
Tongue
English
Weight
547 KB
Volume
44
Category
Article
ISSN
0378-3758

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


On the Power Function of the Likelihood
✍ Dulal Kumar Bhaumik; Sanat K. Sarka πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 77 KB

We prove that the power function of the likelihood ratio test for MANOVA attains its minimum when the rank of the location parameter matrix G decreases from s to 1. This provides a theoretical justification of a result that is known in the literature based only on numerical studies.

Use of the Likelihood Ratio Test on the
✍ Mohamed M. Shoukri πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1982 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 161 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract In this article we give a simple procedure to determine the exact distribution of the likelihood ratio test of a statistical hypothesis regarding the parameter of the uniform distribution. The resulting distribution will be shown to serve as an approximation to the distribution of the l

Design of change detection algorithms ba
✍ Giovanna Capizzi πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 72 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract A design procedure for detecting additive changes in a state‐space model is proposed. Since the mean of the observations after the change is unknown, detection algorithms based on the generalized likelihood ratio test, GLR, and on window‐limited type GLR, are considered. As Lai (1995) p

Erratum: The likelihood ratio test under
✍ Bruce E. Hansen πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 143 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

There was an error in Hansen (1992). I am very grateful to James Hamilton for pointing out the error. Equations ( 2) and (3) in the original read where Q ( a ) is a mean zero Gaussian process with covariance function K(ai, a21 = E(q;(ai)~i(ad). While equation ( 2) is correct, (3) is not. Instead,