<DIV><DIV><DIV><DIV><I>The Ethics and Efficacy of the Global War on Terrorism</I> is a collection of recent and provocative articles by such influential figures as Noam Chomsky and Scott Atran. It presents a variety of perspectives and disciplines that critically examine significant ethical issues i
On the Ethics of War and Terrorism
โ Scribed by Uwe Steinhoff
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press, USA
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 169
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
In this book Uwe Steinhoff describes and explains the basic tenets of just war theory and gives a precise, succinct and highly critical account of its present status and of the most important and controversial current debates surrounding it. Rejecting certain in effect medieval assumptions of traditional just war theory and advancing a liberal outlook, Steinhoff argues that every single individual is a legitimate authority and has under certain circumstances the right to declare war on others or the state. He also argues that the just cause cannot be established independently of the other criteria of jus ad bellum (the justification of entering a war), except for right intention, which he interprets more leniently than the tradition does. Turning to jus in bello (which governs the conduct of a war) he criticizes the Doctrine of Double Effect and concludes that insofar as wars kill innocents, and be it as ''collateral damage'', they cannot be just but at best justified as the lesser evil. Steinhoff gives particular attention to the question why soldiers, allegedly, are legitimate targets and civilians not. Discussing four approaches to the explanation of the difference he argues that the four principles underlying them all need to be taken into account and outlines how their weighing can proceed if applied to concrete cases. The resulting approach does not square the distinction between legitimate and illegitimate targets with the distinction between soldiers and civilians, which has extremely important consequences for the conduct of war. Finally, Steinhoff analyses the concept of terrorism and argues that some forms of ''terrorism'' are actually not terrorism at all and that even terrorism proper can under certain circumstances be justified.
โฆ Table of Contents
Contents......Page 6
Acknowledgements......Page 8
Introduction......Page 10
1. Legitimate Authority......Page 16
2. Just Cause (Including Subcriteria) and Right Intention......Page 32
3. Innocents, Double Effect and Proportionality......Page 42
4. Non-combatant Immunity and the Definition of Non-innocence and Innocence......Page 70
5. The Ethics of Terrorism......Page 118
Notes......Page 148
References......Page 162
I......Page 168
W......Page 169
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Most people strongly condemn terrorism; yet they often fail to say how terrorist acts differ from other acts of violence such as the killing of civilians in war. Stephen Nathanson argues that we cannot have morally credible views about terrorism if we focus on terrorism alone and neglect broader iss
Most people strongly condemn terrorism; yet they often fail to say how terrorist acts differ from other acts of violence such as the killing of civilians in war. Stephen Nathanson argues that we cannot have morally credible views about terrorism if we focus on terrorism alone and neglect broader iss
Most people strongly condemn terrorism; yet they often fail to say how terrorist acts differ from other acts of violence such as the killing of civilians in war. Stephen Nathanson argues that we cannot have morally credible views about terrorism if we focus on terrorism alone and neglect broader iss
Includes bibliographical references (p. 361-388) and indexes