On the development and psychometric testing of the WHO screening instrument to assess disablement in the general population
✍ Scribed by Dr Jürgen Rehm; T. Bedirhan Üstün; Shekhar Saxena; Christopher B. Nelson; Somnath Chatterji; Frank Ivis; ED Adlaf
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 245 KB
- Volume
- 8
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1049-8931
- DOI
- 10.1002/mpr.61
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The development and psychometric testing of the new World Health Organization (WHO) disablement screening instrument for the general population is described. Two samples were used for the empirical tests: the cross‐cultural sample of the WHO Disablement Assessment Schedule (WHO‐DAS II) field tests in 19 countries (N = 1323), and an Ontario (Canada) general population sample (N = 802). Psychometric tests included procedures from classical test theory as well as analyses based on item response theory (IRT), both parametric and non‐parametric. Results showed that the disablement screener had good properties with respect to classical test theory, but lacked compatibility with respect to IRT criteria. This lack of compatibility with IRT criteria generally leads to a test that must be redefined for each new sample and each time it is administered. Hence, the results reported in this paper suggest that the WHO disablement screener needs revision, if it is to serve as an international cross‐cultural instrument. Copyright © 1999 Whurr Publishers Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Background Development of efficient methods for identifying subjects with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) from the general population is warranted, because these subjects represent an important group for (epidemiological) research purposes. ## Objectives (1) To describe a two‐step
Although psychiatric illnesses are common occurrences in institutions taking care of the elderly, admission is seldom preceded by a mental health evaluation and only rarely are there provisions for ongoing psychiatric care. Screening ;I population for specific psychiatric disorders is traditionally
## Abstract ## Objective Recently, the use of patient self‐reporting instruments instead of clinical, objective measurements to assess rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients was proposed. This assumes a constant association between disease activity and the self‐reporting instruments. The objective was