We believe that confusion has been generated by the way we discussed our concepts of criticality and ignition. The cause of this confusion is the paragraph in our paper [1] that contains Eq. ( ). The word "ignition" was used just before the equation, whereas we should have used instead the word "cri
✦ LIBER ✦
On the definition of the reproductive value: response to the discussion by Bacaër and Abdurahman
✍ Scribed by Dalkhat M. Ediev
- Book ID
- 105998680
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 137 KB
- Volume
- 59
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0303-6812
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Response to R. H. Essenhigh, “A comment
✍
Jean-Claude Lermant; Sidney Yip
📂
Article
📅
1986
🏛
Elsevier Science
🌐
English
⚖ 61 KB
On the Definition and Measurement of Hum
✍
Allison M. Curran; Scott I. Rabin; Paola A. Prada; Kenneth G. Furton
📂
Article
📅
2006
🏛
Springer
🌐
English
⚖ 117 KB
On the Value of the Panentheistic Analog
✍
Philip Clayton
📂
Article
📅
2000
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 94 KB
Response to Guttman & Levy's article ‘on
✍
Frank M. Andrews; Aubrey C. McKennell
📂
Article
📅
1982
🏛
Springer Netherlands
🌐
English
⚖ 573 KB
Response to discussion on ‘The extent of
✍
M. McHugh; T. R. Harrod; R. P. C. Morgan
📂
Article
📅
2003
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 52 KB
👁 2 views
## Abstract The research described in the paper by McHugh __et al.__ (__Earth Surface Processes and Landforms__, 2002, Vol. 27, pp. 99–107) was based upon a fundamental, national baseline study initiated to assess, in an objective and statistically sound manner, the scale of upland soil erosion in
Comment on ‘Deformation of the NE Basin
✍
S. H. Lamb
📂
Article
📅
2007
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 103 KB