Let 70 and yi be Legendrian knots which are isotopic as usual knots, and which have the same obvious invariants rot and link. It seems to be an open question whether yo and 71 are isotopic as Legendrian knots. In the paper we give a positive answer to this question for the (rather restricted) class
On the 1-bridge genus of small knots
β Scribed by Phoebe Hoidn
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 151 KB
- Volume
- 106
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0166-8641
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
A Heegaard splitting for S 3 gives a 1-bridge presentation for a knot k β S 3 if the knot intersects each handlebody of the Heegaard splitting in an arc which forms the interior part of the boundary of a disk in the handlebody. The minimal g for which the knot has a 1-bridge presentation of genus g is called the 1-bridge genus g 1 (k). The object of the article is the behaviour of this invariant under the connected sum k 1 #k 2 . More precisely, for small knots k 1 and k 2 which are knots which do not have essential closed surfaces in their exteriors, our purpose is to show the following inequality:
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
A conjecture of Robertson and Thomas on the orientable genus of graphs with a given nonorientable embedding is disproved.
The 1-genus of a graph is the smallest possible genus of an orientable surface such that the graph can be drawn on the surface so that each edge is crossed over by no more than one other edge. An example with smallest number of vertices is given showing that the 1-genus of a graph is not additive, i
Gross and Rosen asked if the genus of a 2-dimensional complex K embeddable in some (orientable) surface is equal to the genus of the graph of appropriate barycentric subdivision of K. We answer the nonorientable genus and the Euler genus versions of Gross and Rosen's question in affirmative. We show