𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

On separating systems of graphs

✍ Scribed by CAI Mao-cheng


Book ID
103059766
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1984
Tongue
English
Weight
208 KB
Volume
49
Category
Article
ISSN
0012-365X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Given a finite loopless graph G (resp. digraph D), let ~r(G), q~(G) and ~k(D) denote the minimal cardinalities of a completely separating system of (3, a separating system of G and a separating system of D, respectively. The main results of this paper are: (i) o'(G) =rain m Lm/2J ~'y(G) and ~0(G)= ['log 2 "y(G)] where 3'(G) denotes the chromatic number of (3. (ii) All the problems of determining o-(G), ~o(G) and q~(D) are NP-complete.

1. Pre "lmainmies

The graphs and the digraphs considered in this paper are all finite. No loops are permitted.

In order to state our problems we need to generalize the definitions of separating systems of a finite set.

Let G =(V,E) be a graph with vertex-set V(G) and edge-set E(G), and F={XI ..... X,,} a family of subsets of V(G).

Call F a total separating system of G if for any adjacent vl, v i ~ V(G) there exist disjoint Xk, X~ ~ F such that vl ~ Xk and v i ~ X~.

Similarly, F is called a completely separating system of G if for any adjacent vi, v i ~ V(G) there exist Xk, Xz ~ F such that v~ ~ Xk, vj ~ X, vi ~ XI and vj ~ Xk.

Define F as a separating system of G if for any adjacent v~, v i ~ V(G) there is Xk ~ F containing exactly one of them.

Clearly, when G = (V, E) is a complete graph, the total separating system, the completely separating system and the separating system of G defined above become those corresponding to the set V(G) (see , [3] and [5] for the terminology).

Let -r(G), tr(G) and q~(G) denote the minimal cardinalities of a total separating system, a completely separating system and a separating system of G, respectively.

Given a digraph D =(V, A) with vertex-set V(D) and arc-set A(D), a family F ={X1, β€’ β€’., X,,} of subsets of V(D) is called a separating system of D if for any arc (v~,vi)~A(D) there is Xk~F such that v~C:Xk and vi~Xk. Let ~k(D) denote the minimal cardinality IF] of such a system of D.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


More on (2,2)-separating systems
✍ Cohen, G.; Encheva, S.; Schaathun, H.G. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› IEEE 🌐 English βš– 305 KB
On matroid separations of graphs
✍ Klaus Truemper πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1987 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 308 KB

Let K be a connected and undirected graph, and M be the polygon matroid of K . Assume that, for some k 2 1, the matroid M is kseparable and k-connected according to the matroid separability and connectivity definitions of W. T. Tutte. In this paper we classify the matroid kseparations of M in terms

On the separability of graphs
✍ Schaudt, Oliver; Schrader, Rainer; Weil, Vera πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2013 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 267 KB
On length-separating test tube systems
✍ ErzsΓ©bet Csuhaj-VarjΓΊ; Sergey Verlan πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› Springer Netherlands 🌐 English βš– 489 KB
On separable self-complementary graphs
✍ Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi; Atsuhiro Nakamoto; Yoshiaki Oda; Katsuhiro Ota; Shinsei πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 65 KB
Algorithms on clique separable graphs
✍ Fǎnicǎ Gavril πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1977 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 925 KB

We define a family of graphs. tailed the clique sepambk graphs. characterized by the fact that they have completely connected rut sets by which we decompose them into r)arts such that when no further decomposition is possible we have a set of simple subgraphs. For example the chordal gmphs and the i