✦ LIBER ✦

On selecting the best of two normal populations using a loss function

✍ Scribed by Paul van der Laan; Constance van Eeden

Publisher: Springer
Year: 1998
Tongue: English
Weight: 751 KB
Volume: 7
Category: Article
ISSN: 1613-981X
DOI: 10.1007/bf03178926

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

On estimating the mean of the selected n

On estimating the mean of the selected normal population under the LINEX loss function

✍ Neeraj Misra; EdwardC.van der Meulen 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 129 KB

Asymptotic considerations for selecting

Asymptotic considerations for selecting the best component of a multivariate normal population

✍ N. Mukhopadhyay 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 467 KB

On the best equivariant estimator of mea

On the best equivariant estimator of mean of a multivariate normal population

✍ F Perron; N Giri 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 619 KB

Selecting the Best Population Using a Te

Selecting the Best Population Using a Test for Equality Based on Minimal Wilcoxon Rank-sum Precedence Statistic

✍ Hon Keung Tony Ng; N. Balakrishnan; S. Panchapakesan 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 588 KB

On the admissibility of an estimator of

On the admissibility of an estimator of a normal mean vector under a linex loss function

✍ Ahmad Parsian 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Springer Japan 🌐 English ⚖ 431 KB

A note on sequential estimation of the s

A note on sequential estimation of the size of a population under a general loss function

✍ Z.D. Bai; Mosuk Chow 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 78 KB

In estimating the size of a ÿnite population under a sequential sampling scheme where the stopping rule is to stop sampling when a ÿxed number of marked items are observed, it has been shown that the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) does not have an explicit expression and is inadmissible under we