On sampling and sampling errors in histomorphometry of peripheral nerve fibers
β Scribed by Stefano Geuna; Davilene Gigo-Benato; Antonio De Castro Rodrigues
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 200 KB
- Volume
- 24
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0738-1085
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Histomorphometrical assessment of regenerated peripheral nerves is a very common goal of many studies in experimental microsurgery. In this paper, the main critical issues in nerve fiber sampling for quantitative morphological assessment are addressed. The equal opportunity rule, i.e., the basic paradigm of random sampling, is described, together with an explanation of how sampling errors, in the selection of histologic fields and of the nerve fibers inside them, can produce a bias in quantitative estimates. Finally, some practical suggestions on how to cope with the most common sampling errors are provided, in order to help researchers obtain reliable histomorphometrical data on peripheral nerve fibers. Β© 2003 WileyβLiss, Inc.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Sampling variances and analytical variances were estimated in a study of five chemical forms of Mn in nine soil types from a greenhouse experiment. A sampling and analytical quality control scheme and a robust analysis of variance were used for this purpose and proved appropriate. The resulting stat
## Abstract The errors introduced into radar estimates of rainfall by making observations at spatial and temporal resolutions that are coarse compared with precipitation systems' characteristic length and time scales are explored in this study. High resolution (200 m, 50 s) Xβband radar data from 4
This paper studies in-sample and out-of-sample tests for Granger causality using Monte Carlo simulation. The results show that the out-of-sample tests may be more powerful than the in-sample tests when discrete structural breaks appear in time series data. Further, an empirical example investigating