✦ LIBER ✦

On regularity of sup-preserving maps: generalizing Zareckiĭ’s theorem

✍ Scribed by Ulrich Höhle; Tomasz Kubiak

Publisher: Springer
Year: 2011
Tongue: English
Weight: 341 KB
Volume: 83
Category: Article
ISSN: 0037-1912
DOI: 10.1007/s00233-011-9311-0

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

On the partial regularity of energy-mini

On the partial regularity of energy-minimizing, area-preserving maps

✍ L.C. Evans; R.F. Gariepy 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 139 KB

Generalization of istratescu's theorem o

Generalization of istratescu's theorem on contractive mappings in metric spaces

✍ M. L. Katkov 📂 Article 📅 1982 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 381 KB

Orthogonality Preserving Transformations

Orthogonality Preserving Transformations on Indefinite Inner Product Spaces: Generalization of Uhlhorn's Version of Wigner's Theorem

✍ Lajos Molnár 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 146 KB

We present an analogue of Uhlhorn's version of Wigner's theorem on symmetry transformations for the case of indefinite inner product spaces. This significantly generalizes a result of Van den Broek. The proof is based on our main theorem, which describes the form of all bijective transformations on

On the generalization of Higman and Krus

On the generalization of Higman and Kruskal's theorems to regular languages and rational trees

✍ Benedetto Intrigila; Stefano Varricchio 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 155 KB

On Pták's generalization of the open-map

On Pták's generalization of the open-mapping and closed-graph theorems

✍ Carl L. DeVito 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 French ⚖ 450 KB

A direct proof of Wigner's theorem on ma

A direct proof of Wigner's theorem on maps which preserve transition probabilities between pure states of quantum systems

✍ C.S Sharma; D.F Almeida 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 539 KB

A direct proof of Wignefs theorem on transition probability preserving maps between pure states of a quantum system and a more precise statement of the theorem are provided. The mathematical proof presented here shows that the result should be as obvious to every one as it has been to Wigner.