SETS by GERD WECHSUNG in Jena (G.D.R.)') 0. Iritroduet,ion and Resnlt,s The consequences of the existence of Theorem 1 ([3]). P = KP o There exists a &-complete sparse set d 7 ~ coNP. Theorem 2 ( [ 7 ] ) . P = N P e There exists a SL-complete sparse set in NP. B precursor of Theorem 2 is contained i
On reductions of NP sets to sparse sets
✍ Scribed by Steven Homer; Luc Longpré
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1994
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 678 KB
- Volume
- 48
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-0000
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Ogiwara and Watanabe showed that if SAT is bounded truth-table reducible to a sparse set, then P = NP. In this paper we simplify their proof, strengthen the result and use it to obtain several new results. Among the new results are the following:
• Applications of the main theorem to log-truth-table and log-Turing reductions of NP sets to sparse sets. One typical example is that if SAT is log-truth-table reducible to a sparse set then NP is contained in DTIME (2°(1°g2")).
• Generalizations of the main theorem which yields results similar to the main result at arbitrary levels of the polynomial hierarchy and which extend as well to strong nondeterministic reductions.
• The construction of an oracle relative to which P ¢ NP but there are NP-complete sets which are f(n)-tt-reducible to a tally set, for any f(n)co(log n). This implies that, up to relativization, some of our results are optimal.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
We prove that there is no sparse hard set for P under logspace computable bounded truth-table reductions unless P=L. In case of reductions computable in NC 1 , the collapse goes down to P=NC 1 . We parameterize this result and obtain a generic theorem allowing us to vary the sparseness condition, th