✦ LIBER ✦

On Projective Planes of Order 15 Admitting a Collineation of Order 7

✍ Scribed by Chihiro Suetake

Book ID: 110222180
Publisher: Springer
Year: 2000
Tongue: English
Weight: 156 KB
Volume: 81
Category: Article
ISSN: 0046-5755
DOI: 10.1023/a:1005276006534

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Collineation groups of projective planes

Collineation groups of projective planes of order n

✍ Joseph J Rotman 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 906 KB

On the classification of projective plan

On the classification of projective planes of order 15 with a Frobenius group of order 30 as a collineation group

✍ Eshref Ademaj 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 458 KB

Projective planes of prime order p that

Projective planes of prime order p that admit collineation groups of order p2

✍ Norman L. Johnson 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 592 KB

The nonexistence of projective planes of

The nonexistence of projective planes of order 12 with a collineation group of order 16

✍ Chihiro Suetake 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 333 KB

The nonexistence of projective planes of

The nonexistence of projective planes of order 12 with a collineation group of order 8

✍ Kenzi Akiyama; Chihiro Suetake 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 183 KB

## Abstract In this article, we prove that there does not exist a symmetric transversal design ${\rm STD}\_2[12;6]$ which admits an automorphism group of order 4 acting semiregularly on the point set and the block set. We use an orbit theorem for symmetric transversal designs to prove our result. A

On collineation groups of a projective p

On collineation groups of a projective plane of prime order

✍ Chat Yin Ho; Adilson Goncalves 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 463 KB

Towards the study of finite projective plane of prime order, the following result is proved in this paper. Let 7r be a projective plane of prime order p and let G be a collineation group of n. If P[I G I, then either n is Desarguesian or the maximal normal subgroup of G is not trivial. In particular