๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

On program schemata equivalence

โœ Scribed by V.E. Itkin; V.E. Itkin; Z. Zwinogrodzki


Book ID
104148091
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1972
Tongue
English
Weight
584 KB
Volume
6
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-0000

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Some problems related to the class of program schemata introduced by R. M. Karp and R. M. Miller in paper [1] are solved in this paper.

The method of the proof implemented in the paper allows us to obtain a negative solution of the existence problem of an algorithm for equivalence recognition for a wide class of program schemata which can be reduced to the above class, and for a wide class of equivalence definitions.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Program Development Schemata as Derived
โœ Penny Anderson; David Basin ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 431 KB

We show how the formalization and application of schemata for program development can be reduced to the formalization and application of derived rules of inference. We formalize and derive schemata as rules in theories that axiomatize program data and programs themselves. We reduce schema-based prog

Equivalences on program schemes
โœ R. Milner ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1970 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 654 KB

A program scheme may be informally described as a program with the interpretation (i.e., the meaning of the basic instructions or standard functions) left unspecified. This paper studies the equivalence of program schemes under different classes of interpretations, with emphasis on those in which th

Program schemata vs. automata for decida
โœ N.V. Shilov ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 922 KB

A new technique for decidability of program logics is introduced. This technique is applied to the most expressive propositional program logic -mu-calculus. 0. Introduction We would like to present program scheme technique (PST) for decidability of program and polymodal propositional logics. This te