๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

On pattern-directed search of archives and collections

โœ Scribed by Dworman, Garett O. ;Kimbrough, Steven O. ;Patch, Chuck


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
135 KB
Volume
51
Category
Article
ISSN
0002-8231

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This article begins by presenting and discussing the distinction between record-oriented and pattern-oriented search. Examples of record-oriented (or item-oriented) questions include: "What (or how many, etc.) glass items made prior to 100 A.D. do we have in our collection?" and "How many paintings featuring dogs do we have that were painted during the 19th century, and who painted them?" Standard database systems are well suited to answering such questions, based on the data in, for example, a collections management system. Examples of pattern-oriented questions include: "How does the (apparent) production of glass objects vary over time between 400 B.C. and 100 A.D.?" and "What other animals are present in paintings with dogs (painted during the 19th century and in our collection)?" Standard database systems are not well suited to answering these sorts of questions (and pattern-oriented questions in general), even though the basic data is properly stored in them. To answer pattern-oriented questions it is the accepted solution to transform the underlying (relational) data to what is called the data cube or cross tabulation form (there are other forms as well). We discuss how this can be done for non-numeric data, such as are found widely in museum collections and archives. Further we discuss and demonstrate two distinct, but related, approaches to exploring for patterns in such cross tabulated museum data. The two approaches have been implemented as the prototype systems Homer and MOTC. We conclude by discussing initial experimental evidence indicating that these approaches are indeed effective in helping people find answers to their pattern-oriented questions of museum and archive collections.

  1. What kind of tree is this? 2. Which are the birch trees? 3. Which conifers are less than 5 years old? 4. How many oak trees are there?

The reader can no doubt think of many other examples. Simply imagine that we have a catalog of a forest with a record for each (individual) tree. These individual tree records record what we know about each of the trees. These


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Semantic annotation and search of cultur
โœ Guus Schreiber; Alia Amin; Lora Aroyo; Mark van Assem; Victor de Boer; Lynda Har ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 810 KB

In this article we describe a Semantic Web application for semantic annotation and search in large virtual collections of cultural-heritage objects, indexed with multiple vocabularies. During the annotation phase we harvest, enrich and align collection metadata and vocabularies. The semantic-search

Error Rates on Two Forms of the Self-Dir
โœ MARK J. MILLER ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› American Counseling Association ๐ŸŒ English โš– 338 KB

The number and type of scoring errors made on Holland's Self-Directed Search-R (SDS-R) are examined. participants were high school juniors and seniors. The results indicate that although some errors were made, the SDS-R was perceived as a useful career assessment tool. Implications of the results ar