Three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning often involves complex combinations of beam energies, treatment fields, and beam modifying devices. Even when a plan is devised that meets many treatment-planning objectives, limitations in the planner's ability to further adjust beam characteristics may req
On linear infeasibility arising in intensity-modulated radiation therapy inverse planning
β Scribed by Yair Censor; Adi Ben-Israel; Ying Xiao; James M. Galvin
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 383 KB
- Volume
- 428
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0024-3795
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) gives rise to systems of linear inequalities, representing the effects of radiation on the irradiated body. These systems are often infeasible, in which case one settles for an approximate solution, such as an {Ξ±, Ξ²}-relaxation, meaning that no more than Ξ± percent of the inequalities are violated by no more than Ξ² percent. For real-world IMRT problems, there is a feasible {Ξ±, Ξ²}-relaxation for sufficiently large Ξ±, Ξ² > 0, however large values of these parameters may be unacceptable medically.
The {Ξ±, Ξ²}-relaxation problem is combinatorial, and for given values of the parameters can be solved exactly by mixed integer programming (MIP), but this may be impractical because of problem size, and the need for repeated solutions as the treatment progresses.
As a practical alternative to the MIP approach we present a heuristic non-combinatorial method for finding an approximate relaxation. The method solves a linear program for each pair of values of the parameters {Ξ±, Ξ²} and progresses through successively increasing values until an acceptable solution is found, or is determined non-existent. The method is fast and reliable, since it consists of solving a sequence of linear programs.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
It is commonly believed that not all degrees of freedom are needed to produce good solutions for the treatment planning problem in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). However, typical methods to exploit this fact either increase the complexity of the optimization problem or are heuristic i