Let M M be the lattice of length 2 with n G 1 atoms. It is an open problem to n Ž decide whether or not every such lattice or indeed whether or not every finite . lattice can be represented as an interval in the subgroup lattice of some finite group. We complete the work of the second author, Lucchi
On Lattices of p —Local Formations of Finite Groups
✍ Scribed by A. Ballester-Bolinches; L. A. Shemetkov
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 500 KB
- Volume
- 186
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0025-584X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Throughout the paper we consider only finite groups.
In [l] W. GASCHUTZ introduced the notion of formation which is useful and convenient for stu.dying not only groups but also other algebraic systems (see [2]). Recall that a class 3 of groups is called a formation if it is closed under taking homomorphic images and G / A E 3, G / B E 7 always implies CIA n B E 3. A very significant notion of local formation is contained in [l] as well. A non-empty formation 3 is called local if there exists a function f, assigning to every prime p a formation f ( p ) , such that If is the class of all groups G having a chief series G = GO 3 G I 3 . . . 3 Gt = 1 in which G/CG(Gi-l/Gi) E f(p) for every i and every prime p dividing IGi-1 : Gi(; ,hat function f is called a local screen of F. By the celebrated Gaschuta -Lubeseder -Schmid theorem [3; IV, 4.61, the following statements about a non-empty formation T are equivalent: a) 3 is local, b) F is saturated, i.e., G/$(G) E 3 always implies G E 3.
It is clear that the intersection of all local formations containing some class X of groups is again a local formation, which is the smallest local formation containing A!. This formation is denoted by lform(X). It is well known that the set of all local formations is a subsernigroup of the semigroup of all formations (the Gaschutz product FG of the formations 3 and 6 is the class of all groups whose G-residuals belong Let p be a prime. Following [4] we say that a non-empty formation 3 is p-local if Iform(F) is contained in NPt3, where p' is the set of all primes different from p and Npt is the class of all nilpotent p'-groups. In [5] it was proved that a non-empty formation 3 is p-local if and only if it is p-saturated, i.e., G/(O,(G) n +(G)) E 3 always implies G E F. This result does not follow from FORSTER'S generalization [6] of the Gaschutz -Lubeseder -Schmid theorem. It is clear that a non -empty formation is local if it is p-local for all p in the set P of all primes. 1.0 3). 1991 Maihernatio Subject Classificaiion. Primary 20D10. Keywords and phrases. Finite groups, formations. Ballester -Bolinches/Shemetkov, On Lattices of p -Local Formations of Finite Groups 59
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## dedicated to k. doerk on his 60th birthday Given two subgroups U V of a finite group which are subnormal subgroups of their join U V and a formation , in general it is not true that U V = U V . A formation is said to have the Wielandt property if this equality holds universally. A formation wit
## Introduction. 1. p-groups with Small Groups of Operators. 2. The Number of Solutions to x p s 1 in a Sylow p-subgroup of the Symmetric Group. 3. p-groups with Maximal Elementary Subgroup of Order p 2 . 4. On the Maximal Order of Subgroups of Given Exponent in a p-group. ## 5. p-groups with
We use the classification of finite simple groups to demonstrate that Conjecture Ž Ž . . 4.1 of G. R. Robinson 1996, Proc. London Math. Soc. 3 72, 312᎐330 and Dade's projective conjecture hold for finite groups of p-local rank one.