## Abstract Bruen and Thas proved that the size of a large minimal blocking set is bounded by $q \cdot {\sqrt{q}} + 1$. Hence, if __q__ = 8, then the maximal possible size is 23. Since 8 is not a square, it was conjectured that a minimal blocking 23‐set does not exist in PG(2,8). We show that this
On large minimal blocking sets in PG(2,q)
✍ Scribed by Tamás Szőnyi; Antonello Cossidente; András Gács; Csaba Mengyán; Alessandro Siciliano; Zsuzsa Weiner
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 172 KB
- Volume
- 13
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1063-8539
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The size of large minimal blocking sets is bounded by the Bruen–Thas upper bound. The bound is sharp when q is a square. Here the bound is improved if q is a non‐square. On the other hand, we present some constructions of reasonably large minimal blocking sets in planes of non‐prime order. The construction can be regarded as a generalization of Buekenhout's construction of unitals. For example, if q is a cube, then our construction gives minimal blocking sets of size q^4/3^ + 1 or q^4/3^ + 2. Density results for the spectrum of minimal blocking sets in Galois planes of non‐prime order is also presented. The most attractive case is when q is a square, where we show that there is a minimal blocking set for any size from the interval $[4q,{\rm log}, q, q\sqrt q-q+2\sqrt q]$. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Combin Designs 13: 25–41, 2005.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract In a previous paper 1, all point sets of minimum size in __PG__(2,__q__), blocking all external lines to a given irreducible conic ${\cal C}$, have been determined for every odd __q__. Here we obtain a similar classification for those point sets of minimum size, which meet every externa
## Abstract Large sets of disjoint group‐divisible designs with block size three and type 2^n^4^1^ were first studied by Schellenberg and Stinson because of their connection with perfect threshold schemes. It is known that such large sets can exist only for __n__ ≡0 (mod 3) and do exist for all odd