๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

On Humanism (Thinking in Action)

โœ Scribed by Richard Norman


Tongue
English
Leaves
177
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


On Literature (Thinking in Action)
โœ Hillis Miller ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2002 ๐Ÿ› Routledge ๐ŸŒ English

Debates rage over what kind of literature we ought to read, what is good and bad literature, and whether in the digital age, literature even has a future. But what exactly is literature? How do we know when we have a piece of literature in our hand? Why we should read literature? And how do we read

On Anxiety (Thinking in Action)
โœ Renata Salecl ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐Ÿ› Routledge ๐ŸŒ English

A lucid and elegant Lacanian reading of the related issues of anxiety in contemporay culture, covering the neurotic, psychotic, and perversive cases on topics of wide range. It doesn't offer long, detailed exposition on Lacan or Freud's theories themselves. However, the Lacanian lens casts quite ins

On Science (Thinking in Action)
โœ Brian Ridley ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› Routledge ๐ŸŒ English

Ridley has a keen sense of the role, strengths, and limits of science as a branch of human knowledge. This work circumscribes science and seeks to be a contribution towards shedding some megalomaniacal ambitions of scientism, which in the tradition of Comte, raises science to the highest order of k

On Cloning (Thinking in Action)
โœ John Harris ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐Ÿ› Routledge ๐ŸŒ English

Cloning - few words have as much potential to grip our imagination or grab the headlines. No longer the stuff of science fiction or Star Wars - it is happening now. Yet human cloning is currently banned throughout the world, and therapeutic cloning banned in many countries. In this highly controve

On Belief (Thinking in Action)
โœ Slavoj Zizek ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› Routledge ๐ŸŒ English

This is one of the my favorites by Zizek (the other being The Fragile Absolute). Zizek is a master at diagnosing the contemporary game for what it is: synthetic, gnostic, and without meaning (Nietzsche wins?!). Yet, he does so in a way that provides, perhaps theoretically, some sort of intellectual