It is shown that if G and H are arbitrary fixed graphs and n is sufficiently large, then Also, we prove that r ( K 1 +F, K,) 5 (m+o(l))&(n -+ GO) for any forest Fwhose largest component has m edges. Thus r(Fe, K,) 5 (1 + o(l))&, where Fe = K1 + CK2. We conjecture that r(Fe, K,) -&(n + cm).
On graphs with linear Ramsey numbers
✍ Scribed by R. L. Graham; V. Rödl; A. Ruciński
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 141 KB
- Volume
- 35
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0364-9024
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
This paper establishes that the local k-Ramsey number R(K m , k -loc) is identical with the mean k-Ramsey number R(K m , k -mean). This answers part of a question raised by Caro and Tuza.
Let G = (V, E ) be a graph on n vertices with average degree t 2 1 in which for every vertex u E V the induced subgraph on the set of all neighbors of u is r-colorable. We show that the independence number of G is at least log t , for some absolute positive constant c. This strengthens a well-known
We show that for each k L 4 there exists a connected k-domination critical graph with independent domination number exceeding k, thus disproving a conjecture of Sumner and Blitch ( J Cornbinatorial Theory B 34 (19831, 65-76) in all cases except k = 3.