## Gordon and Shortliffe [2] advocate the use of Dempster-Shafer (D-S) theory in the evidencegathering process. It is stated that they are unaware of any formal model which could allow inexact reasoning at whatever level of abstraction. Pearl [3] later shows how evidential reasoning can be co
β¦ LIBER β¦
On evidential reasoning in a hierarchy of hypotheses
β Scribed by Judea Pearl
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1986
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 283 KB
- Volume
- 28
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0004-3702
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
A comparison of two evidential reasoning
β
Chia-Hoang Lee
π
Article
π
1988
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 295 KB
A method for managing evidential reasoni
β
Jean Gordon; Edward H. Shortliffe
π
Article
π
1993
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 312 KB
Concept-based evidential reasoning for m
β
B. Srinath Reddy; Otman A. Basir
π
Article
π
2010
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 300 KB
Cryptanalysis on an access control in a
β
C.C. Chang; S.W. Fan; H.T. Liaw; M.Y. Chiou
π
Article
π
1995
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 154 KB
Symmetry operations on a hierarchy of ma
β
Alladi Ramakrishnan
π
Article
π
1968
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 131 KB
Book review: Evidential foundations of p
β
Shawn P. Curley
π
Article
π
1997
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 64 KB
Review by Shawn P. Curley, University of Minnesota Currently somewhat on the fringes of behavioral decision theory is the study of informal reasoning as a basis for understanding decision making. Such study oers promise for broadening our understanding of decision making beyond a predominantly black