Kaufrnan's critique of our article was based on a misunderstanding of our purpose and procedures. This reply clarifies those points and suggests
β¦ LIBER β¦
On eliminating the alternative interpretations: a reply to Korman
β Scribed by Robert L. Dipboye
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1977
- Weight
- 99 KB
- Volume
- 18
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0030-5073
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Interpreting the differences: A reply to
β
Warren Umansky; Linda R. Cohen
π
Article
π
1981
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 127 KB
Interpreting the differences: A reply to
β
Stine Levy
π
Article
π
1983
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 116 KB
A reply to the comments on complementary
β
PΓΆyhiΓ€, R. ;Da Costa, D. ;Fitzcharles, M-A.
π
Article
π
2002
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 40 KB
π 1 views
The structural setting of the main doneg
β
D. H. W. Hutton
π
Article
π
2007
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 198 KB
I thank Dr. Berger for his comments on an earlier paper of mine (Hutton 1977) and welcome this opportunity to clarify and expand on various aspects of that work. Berger (1980) has divided the Creeslough Formation in its type area into a lower 'calcareous' unit (occurring in the SE) and an upper pel
Reply to βcomment on direct consequences
β
Myriam S. de Giambiagi; Mario Giambiagi; Paulo Pitanga
π
Article
π
1987
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 164 KB
In this reply to the Comment by Jorge and Batista (Chem. Phys. Letters I38 (1987) 115) we show that the softness of an atom in a molecule is actually proportional to the atom's MO self-charge, as stated before.
Interpreting the texts of nature and cul
β
Kenneth J. Gergen
π
Article
π
1986
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 487 KB